The Martin Marietta facility in New Braunfels has adopted several technologies from Martin Engineering (Neponset, IL) to mitigate the effect of drop forces from 8 in. minus rocks falling 20 ft onto the B-06 conveyor, including a rock box, impact cradle, settling zone and skirt sealing. Installed with a series of belt trackers to maintain proper alignment and a V-plow system to protect the tail pulley, the upgrades are helping the Hunter plant in New Braunfels avoid belt and idler damage, spillage and downtime.
Martin Marietta Reliability Engineer, Rajeshwar Rao Akula, said: “We were experiencing ongoing issues with spillage, broken idlers and belt damage, causing downtime that could last for hours,” he explained. “Every week or so, the system was shut down and a team of 3 to 4 workers would take the better part of a shift to go in with shovels and wheelbarrows to dig the system out and keep it operational. Add to that a belt replacement every six months, and it had become a costly mess.”
The Hunter Cement facility has a large quarry that extracts limestone and sends it to a 60 000 t storage dome, which is over 320 ft in diameter (97.5 m). From there, approximately 350 to 400 tph (317.5 to 362.8 t) of limestone is loaded into a crusher that breaks down the rock to 8 in. minus in diameter (203 mm), then deposits the material into a chute with a 20 ft (6 m) drop onto a 42 in. (1066 mm) conveyor belt. The limestone is conveyed at 380 feet per minute (1.93 m/sec) at a 35-degree incline for 150 ft (48 m) through the tunnel and 150 ft in open air, then directed to the proper kiln to be mixed, heated and processed.
Jonathan Cole, Lead Service Technician for Martin Engineering assigned to the Hunter facility, inspected the system and helped issue recommendations, along with overseeing the installation of improvements. According to Cole, the problems began with the crusher, but extended along the conveyor and through the tunnel. “The conveyor was originally built to handle 4-inch minus,” he observed. “The impact from the long drop blew out idlers and gouged the belt, causing misalignment and extensive spillage.”
After their analysis, the Martin Engineering team presented a proposal offering a solution: “our first recommendation was installing a rock box,” explained Cole. “Set three feet above the belt, it works like a series of shelves, catching and distributing the limestone with reduced force onto an impact cradle.”
Located directly under the chute, the impact cradle is mounted on four rugged steel I-beam supports, able to sustain an impact force of 12 000 lbs. The specially engineered impact bars are based on an aluminum T-slot design, which is surrounded by a layer of energy-absorbing 83A durometer urethane and coated with low-friction UHMW plastic to reduce friction and belt fraying.
Following the impact cradle within the 34 ft (10.3 m) settling zone, the team recommended a series of adjustable slider cradles that support the belt to prevent spillage from belt edge sag and to eliminate entrapment points where material commonly got caught. Another key element of the assessment was an external skirting system along the chute box, sealing the chute to the belt. Specially designed to provide dual-seal efficiency with a one-piece 70 Shore D EPDM durometer rubber composite skirt and an attached strip, the skirting floats on the belt and self-adjusts to maintain an effective seal.
“The wandering belt was a big concern, so we recommended a series of belt trackers with a parallel steering and training system every fifty feet,” Cole added. “Another cause of misalignment was material getting caught between the belt and tail pulley, so we proposed a torsion V-plow as well.” Mounted on a dual steel bar attached to the mainframe a few feet from the tail pulley, the V-plow has a unique suspension system that allows the polyurethane blade to rise and fall with fluctuations in belt tension. Any material carried back on the top of the belt return is deflected to either side of the frame before it reaches the tail pulley.
Installation by Martin Engineering technicians took less than two weeks, and coincided with scheduled breaks for other improvement projects addressing issues throughout the facility. Since the conclusion of work, monthly Walk the BeltTM inspections conducted by Martin Engineering technicians have recorded healthy pulleys and no significant belt damage or need for replacement.
“We are extremely impressed with how the system is performing,” Akula concluded. “The service and maintenance have been excellent, and we are already working with Martin on other projects to further improve operations.”
Read the article online at: https://www.drybulkmagazine.com/special-reports/11112016/martin-marietta-controls-damage-and-spillage/